ROAD TO SAFETY

The rules of safety are highly avoided by the people and  in return they have to claim their life.
Insensitivity amongst  mass are responsible for fatal accidents.
Safety on raods is not a new issue to  be raised though data's showcase how irresponsible public is regarding the matter of security on roads.
Government campaign , hording,pamphlet's,poster,advertisements and offcoaurse the police warned public several times .
We can't blame anyone yet ourself's unconsciousness towards road safety issue.
We are being taught rules of safety since our primary classes but then who cares to follow it?
According to National Crime report bureau' (NCRB)
Recent report 2014, U.P accounts with whooping 62.5%  for the  most fatal death in road accident  in country.
Contrary to general perception two wheeler's are responsible for maximum death 26.4% of total in U.P.
It's an eye opening that 70% of death occur to two wheeler driver's without helmet and 90% death are caused due to head injuries.Now,by this we can estimate significance of wearing helment if we are enough capable to co- realate the facts.
Using mobile while drivoping diverts 50% of our attention ,while  drug\alcohal claimed 12.6% death of the total in U.P.
But still start  following safety rule before its to late.
Wearing helmet can reduce 40% of death risk and by putting on seats bealt 50% of mishaps can be avoided.So, let's take the road- which was not taken until now ,road to safety.

BAN BAN

Time to change your platter and to add totally new cuisine to menu card's of restaurant. Among a lot of controversies these day's the recent band on beef in Maharashtra is a latest topic for discussion among people. India today is the one of top exporters of beef and in fact beef worth and $ 29 million was exported in year 2012-13. Maharashtra Animal Preservation ( Amendment) Bill was passed during previous BJP- shivsena rule at Maharashtra in 1995 which further went to cool during Congress rule and after 19 years it got passed by President. Government is trying to manipulate people by raising their sentiments by giving excuses that it's not about any religion it's about cruelty towards animal. Than why government just had banned the beef alone , it should have ban other too like lamp , chicken and goat. Government try is to play save by diverting people .It's nothing to do with religion than why are we making it a religious issue ?Is government motivating people by raising religion sentiments ?  This is a farmer pro- act as said by government. But a farmer uses bull till the age of 15 after that they become old and week. What will happen to them when they are of no use? Will government provide them proper habitat and care them till they are dead naturally ? 
Poor slaughter who were surviving by selling beef will suffer, well they can sell meet of chicken or goat but how will they adjust in mid as they are practicing it from generation- generation? 
Two people filled a petition adjust this decision Advocate Vishal Seth and a student Shaina Sen at High Court .Petition say's that how can government deprive people from consuming what they want. Whether beef decision is sound or not? Their are much more unsolved question. Well their are a lot of question to discuss and to solve .So keep discussing...